Light tanks were useful for reconnaissance and small-scale missions but too flimsy to withstand intense firepower, while their more heavily armoured siblings sacrificed manoeuvrability for endurance. But tanks of the Cold War era still required relatively flat and dry land to function effectively, so they proved to be far less useful as weapons and transport than helicopters in the jungles of Korea and Vietnam.Ĭold War tank design trended away from the heavy armoured beasts of the WW2 battlefield, largely in response to increasingly sophisticated anti-tank measures and weapons. There is no doubt that the tank remains a fearsome deterrent even to this day news reports that tanks have been seen moving into any skirmish area around the world immediately raises alarms.

Tanks were no longer produced in such vast quantities after the end of WW2, but they continued to be developed and hoarded by Cold War countries, largely as a threat of force initiative – much like atomic weapons. Regardless, the story of the tank since WW2 has not been of obsolescence but of evolution. But today the concept of the tank is one hundred years old, and since its heyday 70 years ago there have been countless debates over whether tanks still have a place in modern warfare. The tank's contribution to operational success was so considerable that an entirely new tactical and technological system of anti-tank warfare was developed, using bazookas, minefields and even anti-tank dogs (with varying degrees of success). Originally invented during WW1 to break through trench lines, the tank didn't reach its full maturity – or potential – until WW2, when it became a significant factor in warfare, both tactically and operationally.

Modern day tank battles